Our analyses measure compliance with NRK-Vedtektene §6 (impartiality and accuracy) using 15 quality criteria.
>50’000Broadcasts
5Programmes
2000–2026Period
15Criteria
Comparison NRK vs. SRG (identical methodology)
| NRK | SRG | |
|---|---|---|
| Ø Score | 3.7 / 10 | 5.2 / 10 |
| N | 367 | 4931 |
Note: These are the 50 most notable NRK episodes. The NRK average (Ø 3.7) is well below the SRG level (Ø 5.2).
Israel/Gaza (17) —
| Date | Score | Topic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reports are currently under review and temporarily unavailable for download. | |||
Ukraina/Russland (25) —
| Date | Score | Topic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reports are currently under review and temporarily unavailable for download. | |||
Innenpolitik (6) —
| Date | Score | Topic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reports are currently under review and temporarily unavailable for download. | |||
Diverse (2) —
| Date | Score | Topic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reports are currently under review and temporarily unavailable for download. | |||
This is a small glimpse into our analysis corpus – access on demand, topics and meta-analyses available for research, newsrooms and political parties.
Methodology: K5+K13 detailed analysis, identical to SRG-OI. Model: Claude Sonnet.
Legal Disclaimer
- No factual determination
- The results presented do not constitute factual determinations about individual persons, editorial teams, or broadcasts. They are the product of a standardized operationalization, not a finding of individual responsibility.
- No legal judgment
- The aggregated deviation index does not replace a legal assessment under Medieansvarslov §4. The determination of whether a specific broadcast violates legal requirements is exclusively the responsibility of the competent authorities (in particular Medietilsynet).
- No proof of causation
- Statistical correlations are not to be interpreted as proof of causal relationships or editorial intent. Deviation values may be influenced by topic selection, news environment, political controversy, or format logic.
- No judgment of intent
- The analysis measures observable structural characteristics of broadcasts. A score of 7 means a significant imbalance was detected — not that the editorial team intended it. The methodology makes no claims about motives or strategic objectives.
- Heuristic comparison tool
- The index serves comparative pattern recognition across thousands of broadcasts, not precise metric measurement of individual segments. Threshold values serve heuristic orientation, not sharp legal qualification.
- AI-Assisted Analysis
- This analysis was produced with the assistance of a large language model (LLM) and systematically cross-checked against original sources (transcripts, subtitles). The procedure is near-deterministic (temperature ≈ 0) but not fully reproducible. Criteria K10–K15 (soft facts) contain interpretive assessments that should be understood as analytical hypotheses.
- Speaking Times Are Approximations
- All speaking time indications are based on word count in the transcript (approx. 150 words/min.) and do not constitute second-precise measurements. They serve comparability across broadcasts, not as an exact metric.