 |
Våre analyser måler overholdelsen av NRK-vedtektene §6 (allsidighet og saklighet) basert på 15 kvalitetskriterier. Tilsynsmyndighet: Medietilsynet. |
 |
Our analyses measure compliance with NRK-Vedtektene §6 (impartiality and objectivity) based on 15 quality criteria. Regulatory authority: Medietilsynet. |
Sammenligning / Comparison: NRK vs. SRG
| NRK | SRG | |
|---|---|---|
| Ø Score | 3.7 / 10 | 5.2 / 10 |
| N | 367 | 4931 |
|
Merknad: Her vises de 20 mest påfallende av over 297 NRK-analyser. NRK-gjennomsnittet (Ø 3.7) ligger betydelig under SRG-nivået (Ø 5.2). |
|
Note: Showing the 20 most notable of over 297 NRK analyses. NRK’s average (Ø 3.7) is significantly below the SRG level (Ø 5.2). |
Dagsnytt 18 (13) —
| Dato | Score | Kontroverse | PDF |
PDF |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rapportene gjennomgås for tiden og er midlertidig ikke tilgjengelige for nedlasting. The reports are currently under review and temporarily unavailable for download. |
||||
Dagsrevyen (4) —
| Dato | Score | Kontroverse | PDF |
PDF |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rapportene gjennomgås for tiden og er midlertidig ikke tilgjengelige for nedlasting. The reports are currently under review and temporarily unavailable for download. |
||||
Debatten (2) —
| Dato | Score | Kontroverse | PDF |
PDF |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rapportene gjennomgås for tiden og er midlertidig ikke tilgjengelige for nedlasting. The reports are currently under review and temporarily unavailable for download. |
||||
Urix (1) —
| Dato | Score | Kontroverse | PDF |
PDF |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rapportene gjennomgås for tiden og er midlertidig ikke tilgjengelige for nedlasting. The reports are currently under review and temporarily unavailable for download. |
||||
|
Disse analysene dokumenterer minutt for minutt kildevalg, taletid, framing og kontekstualisering i norske TV-sendinger. |
|
These analyses document minute-by-minute source selection, speaking time, framing and contextualisation in Norwegian TV broadcasts. |
Dette er et lite innblikk i vårt analysekorpus – innsyn etter behov, temaer og metaanalyser er mulig for forskning, redaksjoner og partier.
This is a small insight into our analysis corpus – access on request, topics and meta-analyses are available for research, newsrooms and parties.
Tilgang / Access:
Metodikk / Methodology: SVFAB Detailed Analysis v1.0 (15 kriterier / criteria, CHES 2024). Modell / Model: Claude Sonnet.
Legal Disclaimer
- No factual determination
- The results presented do not constitute factual determinations about individual persons, editorial teams, or broadcasts. They are the product of a standardized operationalization, not a finding of individual responsibility.
- No legal judgment
- The aggregated deviation index does not replace a legal assessment under Medieansvarslov §4. The determination of whether a specific broadcast violates legal requirements is exclusively the responsibility of the competent authorities (in particular Medietilsynet).
- No proof of causation
- Statistical correlations are not to be interpreted as proof of causal relationships or editorial intent. Deviation values may be influenced by topic selection, news environment, political controversy, or format logic.
- No judgment of intent
- The analysis measures observable structural characteristics of broadcasts. A score of 7 means a significant imbalance was detected — not that the editorial team intended it. The methodology makes no claims about motives or strategic objectives.
- Heuristic comparison tool
- The index serves comparative pattern recognition across thousands of broadcasts, not precise metric measurement of individual segments. Threshold values serve heuristic orientation, not sharp legal qualification.
- AI-Assisted Analysis
- This analysis was produced with the assistance of a large language model (LLM) and systematically cross-checked against original sources (transcripts, subtitles). The procedure is near-deterministic (temperature ≈ 0) but not fully reproducible. Criteria K10–K15 (soft facts) contain interpretive assessments that should be understood as analytical hypotheses.
- Speaking Times Are Approximations
- All speaking time indications are based on word count in the transcript (approx. 150 words/min.) and do not constitute second-precise measurements. They serve comparability across broadcasts, not as an exact metric.