 |
Nuestros análisis miden el cumplimiento de la Ley 26.522 Art. 3 (Ley de Servicios de Comunicación Audiovisual) — si los medios públicos argentinos cumplen con su mandato legal de información equilibrada, objetiva y completa. Organismo regulador: ENACOM. |
 |
Our analyses measure compliance with Ley 26.522 Art. 3 (Audiovisual Communication Services Act) — whether Argentine public media fulfill their legal mandate for balanced, objective and comprehensive reporting. Regulatory authority: ENACOM. |
|
Nota: Estas evaluaciones provienen de nuestra muestra curada de programas de televisión argentinos. Muestran casos ejemplares donde la cobertura se desvía significativamente del mandato de pluralidad. |
|
Note: These evaluations are from our curated sample of Argentine TV broadcasts. They show exemplary cases where coverage significantly deviates from the plurality mandate. |
Programa 678 (7) —
| Fecha / Date | Score | Tema / Topic | PDF |
PDF |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Los informes se encuentran actualmente en revisión y no están disponibles temporalmente para su descarga. The reports are currently under review and temporarily unavailable for download. |
||||
Periodismo Para Todos (1) —
| Fecha / Date | Score | Tema / Topic | PDF |
PDF |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Los informes se encuentran actualmente en revisión y no están disponibles temporalmente para su descarga. The reports are currently under review and temporarily unavailable for download. |
||||
Regulación de medios / Media Regulation (1) —
| Fecha / Date | Score | Tema / Topic | PDF |
PDF |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Los informes se encuentran actualmente en revisión y no están disponibles temporalmente para su descarga. The reports are currently under review and temporarily unavailable for download. |
||||
Era Milei / Ley Bases (3) —
| Fecha / Date | Score | Tema / Topic | PDF |
PDF |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Los informes se encuentran actualmente en revisión y no están disponibles temporalmente para su descarga. The reports are currently under review and temporarily unavailable for download. |
||||
Caso Nisman / Nisman Case (2) —
| Fecha / Date | Score | Tema / Topic | PDF |
PDF |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Los informes se encuentran actualmente en revisión y no están disponibles temporalmente para su descarga. The reports are currently under review and temporarily unavailable for download. |
||||
Debates Presidenciales (3) —
| Fecha / Date | Score | Tema / Topic | PDF |
PDF |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Los informes se encuentran actualmente en revisión y no están disponibles temporalmente para su descarga. The reports are currently under review and temporarily unavailable for download. |
||||
Noticieros / News Programmes (Visión 7 / TPA) (2) —
| Fecha / Date | Score | Tema / Topic | PDF |
PDF |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Los informes se encuentran actualmente en revisión y no están disponibles temporalmente para su descarga. The reports are currently under review and temporarily unavailable for download. |
||||
|
Estos análisis documentan minuto a minuto la selección de fuentes, los tiempos de intervención, el encuadre y la contextualización en programas de televisión argentinos. Sirven como base para reclamos según la Ley 26.522 Art. 3. |
|
These analyses document minute-by-minute source selection, speaking time, framing and contextualisation in Argentine TV broadcasts. They serve as a basis for programme complaints under Ley 26.522 Art. 3. |
Acceso completo para investigación, redacciones y partidos.
Full access for research, newsrooms and political parties.
Metodología / Methodology: SVFAB Detailed Analysis v3.0-detail (15 criterios / criteria, CHES 2024). Modelo / Model: Claude Sonnet.
Legal Disclaimer
- No factual determination
- The results presented do not constitute factual determinations about individual persons, editorial teams, or broadcasts. They are the product of a standardized operationalization, not a finding of individual responsibility.
- No legal judgment
- The aggregated deviation index does not replace a legal assessment under Ley 26.522 Art. 3. The determination of whether a specific broadcast violates legal requirements is exclusively the responsibility of the competent authorities (in particular ENACOM).
- No proof of causation
- Statistical correlations are not to be interpreted as proof of causal relationships or editorial intent. Deviation values may be influenced by topic selection, news environment, political controversy, or format logic.
- No judgment of intent
- The analysis measures observable structural characteristics of broadcasts. A score of 7 means a significant imbalance was detected — not that the editorial team intended it. The methodology makes no claims about motives or strategic objectives.
- Heuristic comparison tool
- The index serves comparative pattern recognition across thousands of broadcasts, not precise metric measurement of individual segments. Threshold values serve heuristic orientation, not sharp legal qualification.
- AI-Assisted Analysis
- This analysis was produced with the assistance of a large language model (LLM) and systematically cross-checked against original sources (transcripts, subtitles). The procedure is near-deterministic (temperature ≈ 0) but not fully reproducible. Criteria K10–K15 (soft facts) contain interpretive assessments that should be understood as analytical hypotheses.
- Speaking Times Are Approximations
- All speaking time indications are based on word count in the transcript (approx. 150 words/min.) and do not constitute second-precise measurements. They serve comparability across broadcasts, not as an exact metric.