Skip to main content

SVFAB



KR

KBS와 MBC의 주요 뉴스 및 시사 프로그램에 대한 독립적 미디어 분석. 15개 기준으로 편향과 조작을 분 단위로 측정합니다.

EN

Independent media analysis of major KBS and MBC news and current affairs programmes. Bias and manipulation measured minute by minute across 15 criteria.

~2.2 Mio방송·기사 / Items
5프로그램 / Programmes
2007–2026기간 / Period
15기준 / Quality Criteria
점수 척도 / Score Scale: 0 = 균형 / balanced — 10 = 강한 편향 / strongly biased. 자세히 / Details: 방법론 / Methodology.
KBS 뉴스9 (10) —
Date Score Topic KR PDF EN PDF
보고서는 현재 검토 중이며 일시적으로 다운로드할 수 없습니다.
The reports are currently under review and temporarily unavailable for download.
KBS 창 (3) —
Date Score Topic KR PDF EN PDF
보고서는 현재 검토 중이며 일시적으로 다운로드할 수 없습니다.
The reports are currently under review and temporarily unavailable for download.
KBS 추적60분 (1) —
Date Score Topic KR PDF EN PDF
보고서는 현재 검토 중이며 일시적으로 다운로드할 수 없습니다.
The reports are currently under review and temporarily unavailable for download.
MBC 뉴스데스크 (1) —
Date Score Topic KR PDF EN PDF
보고서는 현재 검토 중이며 일시적으로 다운로드할 수 없습니다.
The reports are currently under review and temporarily unavailable for download.
KR

이 분석들은 한국 TV 방송의 출처 선택, 발언 시간, 프레이밍 및 맥락화를 분 단위로 기록합니다.

EN

These analyses document minute by minute source selection, speaking time, framing and contextualisation in South Korean TV broadcasts.

Legal Disclaimer

No factual determination
The results presented do not constitute factual determinations about individual persons, editorial teams, or broadcasts. They are the product of a standardized operationalization, not a finding of individual responsibility.
No legal judgment
The aggregated deviation index does not replace a legal assessment under 방송법 제6조. The determination of whether a specific broadcast violates legal requirements is exclusively the responsibility of the competent authorities (in particular KCSC).
No proof of causation
Statistical correlations are not to be interpreted as proof of causal relationships or editorial intent. Deviation values may be influenced by topic selection, news environment, political controversy, or format logic.
No judgment of intent
The analysis measures observable structural characteristics of broadcasts. A score of 7 means a significant imbalance was detected — not that the editorial team intended it. The methodology makes no claims about motives or strategic objectives.
Heuristic comparison tool
The index serves comparative pattern recognition across thousands of broadcasts, not precise metric measurement of individual segments. Threshold values serve heuristic orientation, not sharp legal qualification.
AI-Assisted Analysis
This analysis was produced with the assistance of a large language model (LLM) and systematically cross-checked against original sources (transcripts, subtitles). The procedure is near-deterministic (temperature ≈ 0) but not fully reproducible. Criteria K10–K15 (soft facts) contain interpretive assessments that should be understood as analytical hypotheses.
Speaking Times Are Approximations
All speaking time indications are based on word count in the transcript (approx. 150 words/min.) and do not constitute second-precise measurements. They serve comparability across broadcasts, not as an exact metric.