 |
Our analyses examine media freedom in Turkey through concrete case studies. TRT, the public broadcaster, is at the centre as a state-controlled medium — complemented by analyses of private and opposition media. |
 |
Analizlerimiz, somut vaka çalışmaları aracılığıyla Türkiye’deki medya özgürlüğünü incelemektedir. Devlet kontrolündeki kamu yayıncısı TRT, merkezde yer almakta — özel ve muhalefet medyasının analizleriyle desteklenmektedir. |
|
Here you will find 36 exemplary analyses on elections, RTÜK regulation, the 2016 coup attempt, press freedom and further topics — freely accessible as PDF. The 20 strongest analyses are additionally available in English. |
|
Burada seçimler, RTÜK düzenlemesi, 2016 darbe girişimi, basın özgürlüğü ve diğer konularda 36 örnek analiz bulunmaktadır — PDF olarak ücretsiz erişilebilir. En yüksek puanlı 20 analiz ayrıca İngilizce olarak mevcuttur. |
|
Note: Scores range from 0 (neutral) to 10 (severe manipulation). The cases shown here document the most serious interferences with media freedom. |
|
Not: Puanlar 0 (tarafsız) ile 10 (ağır manipülasyon) arasında değişmektedir. Burada gösterilen vakalar, medya özgürlüğüne yönelik en ciddi müdahaleleri belgelemektedir. |
Seçimler ve seçim haberciliği / Elections & Election Coverage —
| Score | Konu / Topic | |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Raporlar şu anda incelenmekte olup geçici olarak indirilememektedir. The reports are currently under review and temporarily unavailable for download. |
|||
RTÜK ve medya düzenlemesi / RTÜK & Media Regulation —
| Score | Konu / Topic | |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Raporlar şu anda incelenmekte olup geçici olarak indirilememektedir. The reports are currently under review and temporarily unavailable for download. |
|||
2016 darbe girişimi / 2016 Coup Attempt —
| Score | Konu / Topic | |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Raporlar şu anda incelenmekte olup geçici olarak indirilememektedir. The reports are currently under review and temporarily unavailable for download. |
|||
Basın özgürlüğü ve yasalar / Press Freedom & Laws —
| Score | Konu / Topic | |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Raporlar şu anda incelenmekte olup geçici olarak indirilememektedir. The reports are currently under review and temporarily unavailable for download. |
|||
2013 Gezi protestoları / 2013 Gezi Protests —
| Score | Konu / Topic | |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Raporlar şu anda incelenmekte olup geçici olarak indirilememektedir. The reports are currently under review and temporarily unavailable for download. |
|||
Diğer vakalar / Further Cases —
| Score | Konu / Topic | |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Raporlar şu anda incelenmekte olup geçici olarak indirilememektedir. The reports are currently under review and temporarily unavailable for download. |
|||
|
These analyses document minute-by-minute source selection, speaking time, framing and contextualisation — transparent, reproducible and independently verifiable. |
|
Bu analizler dakika dakika kaynak seçimini, konuşma süresini, çerçevelemeyi ve bağlamsallaştırmayı belgelemektedir — şeffaf, tekrarlanabilir ve bağımsız olarak doğrulanabilir. |
|
This is a small glimpse into our analysis corpus – access on demand, topics and meta-analyses available for research, newsrooms and political parties. |
|
25.000’den fazla analizden 36’sı gösterilmektedir. Araştırma, haber merkezleri ve siyasi partiler için tam erişim. |
Legal Disclaimer
- No factual determination
- The results presented do not constitute factual determinations about individual persons, editorial teams, or broadcasts. They are the product of a standardized operationalization, not a finding of individual responsibility.
- No legal judgment
- The aggregated deviation index does not replace a legal assessment under RTÜK Law Art. 8. The determination of whether a specific broadcast violates legal requirements is exclusively the responsibility of the competent authorities (in particular RTÜK).
- No proof of causation
- Statistical correlations are not to be interpreted as proof of causal relationships or editorial intent. Deviation values may be influenced by topic selection, news environment, political controversy, or format logic.
- No judgment of intent
- The analysis measures observable structural characteristics of broadcasts. A score of 7 means a significant imbalance was detected — not that the editorial team intended it. The methodology makes no claims about motives or strategic objectives.
- Heuristic comparison tool
- The index serves comparative pattern recognition across thousands of broadcasts, not precise metric measurement of individual segments. Threshold values serve heuristic orientation, not sharp legal qualification.
- AI-Assisted Analysis
- This analysis was produced with the assistance of a large language model (LLM) and systematically cross-checked against original sources (transcripts, subtitles). The procedure is near-deterministic (temperature ≈ 0) but not fully reproducible. Criteria K10–K15 (soft facts) contain interpretive assessments that should be understood as analytical hypotheses.
- Speaking Times Are Approximations
- All speaking time indications are based on word count in the transcript (approx. 150 words/min.) and do not constitute second-precise measurements. They serve comparability across broadcasts, not as an exact metric.