 |
Our analyses measure the integration performance of French public broadcasters — whether all societal positions are given adequate space, as required by Law No. 86-1067 of 30 September 1986. |
 |
Nos analyses mesurent la performance d’intégration des médias audiovisuels publics français — si toutes les positions sociales disposent effectivement d’un espace, conformément aux principes de la Loi n° 86-1067 du 30 septembre 1986. |
~260’000Contributions
5Programmes
2018–2026Période
15Critères
Note : Ces analyses évaluent le pluralisme et l’équilibre de la couverture médiatique selon 15 critères de qualité. Disponibles en français et en anglais.
Note: These analyses assess pluralism and balance in media coverage across 15 quality criteria. Available in French and English.
Journal de 20h (France 2) —
| Date | Score | Sujet | |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Les rapports sont actuellement en cours de révision et temporairement indisponibles au téléchargement. The reports are currently under review and temporarily unavailable for download. |
||||
C dans l'air (France 5) —
| Date | Score | Sujet | |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Les rapports sont actuellement en cours de révision et temporairement indisponibles au téléchargement. The reports are currently under review and temporarily unavailable for download. |
||||
Un petit aperçu de notre corpus d’analyses – consultation à la demande, thèmes et méta-analyses disponibles pour la recherche, les rédactions et les partis.
This is a small insight into our analysis corpus – access on request, topics and meta-analyses are available for research, newsrooms and parties.
Legal Disclaimer
- No factual determination
- The results presented do not constitute factual determinations about individual persons, editorial teams, or broadcasts. They are the product of a standardized operationalization, not a finding of individual responsibility.
- No legal judgment
- The aggregated deviation index does not replace a legal assessment under Loi 86-1067 Art. 43-11. The determination of whether a specific broadcast violates legal requirements is exclusively the responsibility of the competent authorities (in particular ARCOM).
- No proof of causation
- Statistical correlations are not to be interpreted as proof of causal relationships or editorial intent. Deviation values may be influenced by topic selection, news environment, political controversy, or format logic.
- No judgment of intent
- The analysis measures observable structural characteristics of broadcasts. A score of 7 means a significant imbalance was detected — not that the editorial team intended it. The methodology makes no claims about motives or strategic objectives.
- Heuristic comparison tool
- The index serves comparative pattern recognition across thousands of broadcasts, not precise metric measurement of individual segments. Threshold values serve heuristic orientation, not sharp legal qualification.
- AI-Assisted Analysis
- This analysis was produced with the assistance of a large language model (LLM) and systematically cross-checked against original sources (transcripts, subtitles). The procedure is near-deterministic (temperature ≈ 0) but not fully reproducible. Criteria K10–K15 (soft facts) contain interpretive assessments that should be understood as analytical hypotheses.
- Speaking Times Are Approximations
- All speaking time indications are based on word count in the transcript (approx. 150 words/min.) and do not constitute second-precise measurements. They serve comparability across broadcasts, not as an exact metric.