 |
Naše analýzy měří kvalitu zpravodajství České televize podle 18 kritérií — výběr zdrojů, rozdělení času, framing, kontextualizace a další. Právním základem je Zákon o ČT (č. 483/1991 Sb.) a Zákon o vysílání (č. 231/2001 Sb.), které ukládají ČT poskytovat objektivní, ověřené a vyvážené informace. |
 |
Our analyses measure the quality of Czech Television reporting using 18 criteria — source selection, time allocation, framing, contextualisation and more. The legal basis is the Czech Television Act (No. 483/1991) and the Broadcasting Act (No. 231/2001), which require ČT to provide objective, verified and balanced information. |
|
Analýzy: dočasně žádné — zprávy se převádějí na aktuální verzi metodiky. |
|
Analyses: temporarily none — the reports are being converted to the current version of the methodology. |
Kompletní databáze analýz pro výzkum, redakce a politické strany. / Full analysis database for research, newsrooms and political parties.
Legal Disclaimer
- No factual determination
- The results presented do not constitute factual determinations about individual persons, editorial teams, or broadcasts. They are the product of a standardized operationalization, not a finding of individual responsibility.
- No legal judgment
- The aggregated deviation index does not replace a legal assessment under §2 Zákona o ČT. The determination of whether a specific broadcast violates legal requirements is exclusively the responsibility of the competent authorities (in particular RRTV).
- No proof of causation
- Statistical correlations are not to be interpreted as proof of causal relationships or editorial intent. Deviation values may be influenced by topic selection, news environment, political controversy, or format logic.
- No judgment of intent
- The analysis measures observable structural characteristics of broadcasts. A score of 7 means a significant imbalance was detected — not that the editorial team intended it. The methodology makes no claims about motives or strategic objectives.
- Heuristic comparison tool
- The index serves comparative pattern recognition across thousands of broadcasts, not precise metric measurement of individual segments. Threshold values serve heuristic orientation, not sharp legal qualification.
- AI-Assisted Analysis
- This analysis was produced with the assistance of a large language model (LLM) and systematically cross-checked against original sources (transcripts, subtitles). The procedure is near-deterministic (temperature ≈ 0) but not fully reproducible. Criteria classified as requiring interpretation contain interpretive assessments that should be understood as analytical hypotheses.
- Speaking Times Are Approximations
- Broadcast duration and speaking time are measured from the subtitle timings; how speaking time is distributed among positions is estimated, because subtitles do not identify speakers. The figures serve comparability across broadcasts, not as an exact metric.